RE: Video
Date: Fri 29 Jun 2001 - 14:54:30 PDT
A fair and reasonable point. I'm not altogether sold on your assertion re DV
versus
Beta SP; but the point is; because of the fragmentation of the term DV as
professional
quality and DV as consumer product, I felt, and still feel, clarifying the
understanding
of what's being offered is warranted. If I pay a $100 and get a video of
Jeff Goldblum
sped and then slowed down, I'm going to be disappointed. So will you.
Clark E. Morgan
From: IamDeis@aol.com [mailto:IamDeis@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:17 PM
To: cmorgan@fusioncm.com; jbc-list@adjective.com
Subject: Re: Video
- Professionals don't shoot to DV, they shoot to Beta SP
Hello, Clark...
I'd have to disagree with you on this point. Digital Video is now used by
more professionals than Beta SP (Beta is still the choice for broadcast
news,
but that is a Union thing...). A quality DV camera can cost as much as
$25,000 or more, not quite the realm of kids and their iMac. Even a low
end
$1000 DV camera may be better than broadcast quality Beta tape.
Just food for thought,
Jason Received on Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:54:30 -0400